Enter word or phrase

Look for articles in

Last Updated Thursday March 22 2018 05:16 PM IST

SC refers pleas to deposit demonetized notes to Constitution bench

Text Size
Your form is submitted successfully.

Recipient's Mail:*

( For more than one recipient, type addresses seperated by comma )

Your Name:*

Your E-mail ID:*

Your Comment:

Enter the letters from image :

SC refers pleas to deposit demonetized notes to Constitution bench

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday disposed of 14 petitions seeking its nod to deposit demonetized notes and said that a five-judge Constitution Bench would deal with this aspect besides deciding the validity of Center's decision to demonetize currency notes.

A bench comprising chief justice Dipak Misra and justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud said the Constitution Bench would also deal with the individual plea of those who could not deposit their currency notes during the window period provided by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

Some petitioners claim that they have not challenged the constitutional validity of either certain provisions of the RBI Act and Center's November 8, 2016, notification, rather they want to deposit their demonetized currency notes.

"Our hard-earned money has been confiscated without due process of law and without granting fair opportunity," lawyer Pranav Sachdeva, appearing for one of the petitioners said adding the Constitution bench be constituted as expeditiously as possible.

The bench asked the petitioners to file two to three page-long interlocutory applications in the pending petitions which would be dealt by the constitution bench later.

It then disposed of individual petitions filed by 14 persons seeking permission to deposit currency notes on the ground that they could not deposit the notes with banks due to some unavoidable and compelling reasons.

The apex court had on December 16, last year referred to a Constitution Bench, the issue of validity of government's decision to demonetize currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500.

While holding that the challenge to November 8 notification was in the arena of 'public importance' as complaints of inconvenience have been brought, it said there was a need for a direction for referring it to a larger bench for 'authoritative pronouncement by five judges.'

Read: Latest Nation News

The opinions expressed here do not reflect those of Malayala Manorama. Legal action under the IT Act will be taken against those making derogatory and obscene statements.

Email ID:

User Name:

User Name:

News Letter News Alert
News Letter News Alert