Thiruvananthapuram

29°C

Haze

Enter word or phrase

Look for articles in

Last Updated Thursday November 23 2017 01:55 AM IST

Vodafone challenges TRAI recommendation for Rs 1,050 cr fine

Text Size
Your form is submitted successfully.

Recipient's Mail:*

( For more than one recipient, type addresses seperated by comma )

Your Name:*

Your E-mail ID:*

Your Comment:

Enter the letters from image :

Vodafone logo

New Delhi: Telecom major Vodafone today told the Delhi High Court that the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India's recommendation to the Center to impose Rs 1050 crore penalty on it for not giving inter connectivity to Reliance Jio was an "arbitrary" decision.

TRAI has recommended imposition of a fine of Rs 50 crore for each of the 21 circles of Vodafone, except in Jammu and Kashmir, coming to a total of Rs 1050 crore.

Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva did not pass any orders after TRAI's lawyers sought time till December 19 to take instructions on the steps taken by the authority after it issued a show cause notice to Vodafone on September 27.

Vodafone has claimed that the entire process adopted by TRAI was "arbitrary" as Reliance announced Jio offer on September 5-6 and had thereafter made payment for "augmentation of interconnection links" on September 25 after which there was a 90-day period to provide inter connectivity.

Senior advocate Meet Malhotra and central government standing counsel Kirtiman Singh, appearing for TRAI, sought time for instructions after the court asked how the September 30 meeting of TRAI with all operators was held before expiry of 10 days given to Vodafone to reply to the show cause notice.

"In these circumstances, how can even the findings be sustained," it asked and added that once a recommendation was made it could cloud judgment of decision-taking authority.

Vodafone, represented by senior advocate Rajiv Nayar, contended that it had time till December end this year for providing interconnectivity to Jio and even before expiry of the period it has provided 10,000 connections.

During arguments, Nayar said TRAI did not have the power to recommend imposition of penalty and it can only recommend revocation of license for breach of license conditions and sought setting aside of the recommendation.

He argued that TRAI has the power to impose "financial disincentives" for breach of Quality of Service regulations and to ensure compliance of terms and conditions of license.

Vodafone has also said that no proper hearing was given to it by TRAI before issuance of recommendation of October 21.

The court will hear the matter again on December 21.

TRAI, in its recommendation to the DoT, had said it has found Vodafone to be non-compliant with license conditions and service quality norms given the high rate of call failures and congestion at interconnect points for Rjio.

(With agency inputs)

Your Rating:
Your form is submitted successfully.

Recipient's Mail:*

( For more than one recipient, type addresses seperated by comma )

Your Name:*

Your E-mail ID:*

Your Comment:

Enter the letters from image :

The opinions expressed here do not reflect those of Malayala Manorama. Legal action under the IT Act will be taken against those making derogatory and obscene statements.

Email ID:

User Name:

User Name:

News Letter News Alert
News Letter News Alert